Skip to main content
Legalai.guide
Beginner

Tutorial 03: Document Analysis for Legal Professionals

Master Claude's document upload and analysis features for contracts, M&A documents, leases, litigation materials, and multi-document reviews.

Learning Objectives

By the end of this tutorial, you will:

  • Master Claude's document upload and analysis features
  • Process multi-document reviews efficiently
  • Extract key information from contracts, pleadings, and discovery
  • Analyze M&A documents with confidence (SPA, warranties, conditions)
  • Conduct lease analysis and term abstraction
  • Review MSAs and SLAs for compliance obligations
  • Summarize litigation materials rapidly
  • Compare clause language across documents
  • Export structured contract data to Excel/CSV
  • Compare Claude's document analysis to Harvey and Legora

Time Required: 60 minutes | Level: Beginner | No technical skills required

Claude's Document Capabilities

What Claude Can Process

Document TypeMax SizeBest Use Cases
PDF500+ pagesContracts, briefs, transcripts, deal documents
Word (.docx)500+ pagesDrafts, redlines, memos, agreements
Text filesLargePlain text documents, extracted content
ImagesMultipleSigned docs, exhibits, handwritten notes
SpreadsheetsVia analysisDiscovery logs, billing records, data exports
Email chainsThreadedCommunications analysis, pattern detection

Uploading Documents

Method 1: Direct Upload

  • Click the paperclip icon in Claude
  • Select file(s) from your computer
  • Wait for processing confirmation

Method 2: Copy-Paste

  • Copy text from document
  • Paste directly into conversation
  • Works for quick snippets

Method 3: Projects (Recommended for Matters)

  • Upload documents to Project knowledge base
  • Reference across multiple conversations
  • Documents persist until removed

Pro Tip: Preparing Documents

For best results:

  1. Use text-based PDFs (not scanned images)
  2. Use OCR if you have scanned documents
  3. Remove password protection before upload
  4. Split very large documents if experiencing issues
  5. Name documents clearly for easy reference

Single Document Analysis & Competitive Comparison

Exercise 1: Full Contract Review

Scenario: You've received a 30-page software license agreement. You represent the licensee.

Step 1: Upload the contract (or use sample text below)

Step 2: Use this comprehensive review prompt:

I've uploaded a software license agreement. I represent the LICENSEE
(the company purchasing the software).

Please provide a comprehensive review:

## SECTION 1: EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
- Contract type and parties
- Key commercial terms (price, term, renewal)
- Overall risk assessment (1-10 scale)
- Top 3 concerns requiring immediate attention

## SECTION 2: CLAUSE-BY-CLAUSE ANALYSIS
For each major clause category:
1. License Grant & Scope
2. Fees & Payment
3. Term & Termination
4. Warranties
5. Limitation of Liability
6. Indemnification
7. IP Rights
8. Confidentiality
9. Data Rights & Security
10. Miscellaneous (Governing Law, Assignment, etc.)

Provide:
- Summary of current language
- Risk level: RED (High) | YELLOW (Medium) | GREEN (Low)
- Specific concerns
- Suggested modifications

## SECTION 3: NEGOTIATION PRIORITIES
Rank the top 5 issues to negotiate, with reasoning and suggested
approach for each.

## SECTION 4: QUESTIONS FOR THE BUSINESS
List questions I should ask our business team before finalizing
the negotiation strategy.

Comparing to Harvey and Legora

Harvey's Approach:

  • Pre-built contract review workflows
  • Automatic clause extraction
  • Integration with Harvey Vault for document storage
  • Limited customization of review criteria
  • Requires enterprise contract database setup

Legora's Approach:

  • Tabular Review creates spreadsheet-like analysis
  • Bulk processing of 100s of documents
  • Pre-built workflows for due diligence
  • Portal for sharing with clients
  • Focus on visual data extraction

Claude's Advantage:

  • Complete control over review criteria
  • Custom prompts for your specific concerns
  • No rigid workflow constraints
  • Same output quality at 1/50th the cost
  • Works with any document format
  • Instant setup, no training required

Comparative Document Analysis

Exercise 2: Redline Analysis

Scenario: You sent your standard NDA to a counterparty. They returned a redlined version. You need to understand what changed.

Prompt:

I'm uploading two versions of an NDA:
1. Our original version (clean)
2. Counterparty's redlined version

Please analyze the changes:

## CHANGE LOG
Create a table with columns:
| Section | Our Language (Summary) | Their Change | Impact | Recommendation |

## RISK ASSESSMENT
For changes that increase our risk:
- Explain the practical impact
- Assess severity (HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW)
- Suggest counter-proposal or acceptance rationale

## STRATEGIC ANALYSIS
- What does their pattern of changes tell us about their concerns?
- Which changes are likely non-negotiable for them?
- Where do we have leverage to push back?

## RECOMMENDED RESPONSE
Draft a summary email I could send to the counterparty accepting
some changes, rejecting others, and proposing alternatives.

Exercise 3: Multiple Contract Comparison

Scenario: You're comparing 3 vendor proposals for similar services.

Prompt:

I'm uploading three vendor agreements for similar cloud services.
Help me compare them for my client (the customer).

Create a comparison matrix covering:

## COMMERCIAL TERMS
| Term | Vendor A | Vendor B | Vendor C | Best for Customer |
|------|----------|----------|----------|-------------------|
| Annual Cost | | | | |
| Term Length | | | | |
| Termination Rights | | | | |
| Price Increases | | | | |
| Payment Terms | | | | |

## RISK TERMS
| Risk Area | Vendor A | Vendor B | Vendor C | Least Risky |
|-----------|----------|----------|----------|-------------|
| Liability Cap | | | | |
| Indemnification | | | | |
| Data Rights | | | | |
| Security Commitments | | | | |
| Insurance | | | | |

## SERVICE TERMS
| Feature | Vendor A | Vendor B | Vendor C | Best |
|---------|----------|----------|----------|------|
| SLA/Uptime | | | | |
| Support Level | | | | |
| Implementation | | | | |
| Training | | | | |

## RECOMMENDATION
Based purely on the contract terms (not product features), rank
the vendors and explain your recommendation.

M&A Due Diligence: Share Purchase Agreement Analysis

Exercise 4: SPA Comprehensive Review

Scenario: Your client is acquiring a target company. You need a thorough SPA review.

Prompt:

I've uploaded a Share Purchase Agreement. Please provide an M&A
due diligence focused analysis:

## EXECUTIVE SUMMARY - M&A OVERVIEW
- Transaction structure (asset vs. equity purchase)
- Purchase price and payment terms
- Closing conditions and anticipated timeline
- Overall deal risk assessment

## PURCHASE PRICE ANALYSIS
- Base purchase price
- Adjustments mechanism (earn-outs, escrow, holdbacks)
- Calculation methodology for adjustments
- Working capital targets (if any)
- Transaction costs allocation
- Tax gross-ups (if any)

## REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRANTIES
For Seller, create a table:
| Category | Warranty | Qualification | Knowledge Qualifier? | Materiality Threshold |
|----------|----------|----------------|---------------------|----------------------|

Categories to analyze:
- Organization and authority
- Financial statements accuracy
- Contracts and agreements
- Compliance with laws
- Litigation and disputes
- Environmental
- Employees and benefits
- Intellectual property
- Tax matters

## WARRANTIES ANALYSIS
- Which warranties have materiality baskets (de minimis thresholds)?
- Which have caps on liability?
- Which survive longest post-closing?
- Which are most likely to be breached?
- What indemnification obligations flow from breach?

## CLOSING CONDITIONS
- List all conditions to closing (for both parties)
- Identify conditions favoring buyer vs. seller
- Assess whether conditions are reasonable
- Which conditions have hard long-stop dates?

## INDEMNIFICATION STRUCTURE
- Indemnification basket (minimum losses before claims)
- Cap on indemnification
- Survival period for different warranties
- Escrow or holdback mechanism
- Cap exceptions (never subject to cap)

## DUE DILIGENCE REQUIREMENTS
- What must be delivered at closing?
- SPA exhibits and schedules checklist
- Key documentation to verify before closing
- Representations relating to items that should be checked

## RISK ASSESSMENT
- RED (High) items requiring resolution
- YELLOW (Medium) items requiring negotiation
- GREEN (Acceptable) items
- Critical gaps or missing provisions

## CLOSING READINESS
- Items buyer must verify before closing
- Items seller must prepare for closing
- Likely sources of closing disputes

Key M&A Document Definitions:

  • Share Purchase Agreement (SPA): Master agreement for equity transaction
  • Representations & Warranties: Statements about company condition (subject to indemnification)
  • Closing Conditions: Requirements that must be satisfied before deal closes
  • Indemnification: Post-closing remedy for breach of reps/warranties
  • Earn-out: Additional contingent payment based on post-closing performance
  • Escrow: Funds held in reserve to satisfy potential indemnification claims

Lease Analysis & Abstraction

Exercise 5: Commercial Lease Term Extraction

Scenario: You're managing a real estate portfolio and need to track lease terms for 12 commercial properties.

Prompt:

I've uploaded a commercial lease. Please extract and summarize
all critical lease terms:

## LEASE PARTIES & DATES
- Landlord (Full legal name, entity type):
- Tenant (Full legal name, entity type):
- Execution Date:
- Effective Date:
- Property Address & Unit:

## LEASE TERM
- Initial Term: ___ years from ___ to ___
- Renewal Option 1: ___ years at what rent increase?
- Renewal Option 2: ___ years at what rent increase?
- Auto-renewal? YES / NO
- Notice required for renewal (months in advance):

## RENT SCHEDULE
| Lease Year | Annual Base Rent | Monthly Rent | Escalation |
|------------|------------------|--------------|------------|
| Year 1-2   |                  |              |            |
| Year 3-5   |                  |              |            |
| Year 6+    |                  |              |            |

- Escalation mechanism (fixed %, CPI, market rate reset):
- Free rent period?
- Abatement for improvements?

## OPERATING EXPENSES & NNN
- Base year operating expenses:
- Tenant's share of increases:
- CAM charges included (HVAC, security, etc.):
- Tax and insurance charges:
- Exclusions from operating expenses:

## TENANT OBLIGATIONS
- Permitted uses:
- Prohibited uses:
- Maintenance obligations (landlord vs. tenant):
- Repair obligations:
- Alterations - permitted without consent? With consent?
- Signage rights:
- Parking included? Exclusive? Shared?
- Insurance requirements:

## LANDLORD OBLIGATIONS
- Structural repairs:
- HVAC/utilities maintenance:
- Building code compliance:
- Access guarantees:

## DEFAULT & REMEDIES
- Late rent payment grace period:
- Default triggers:
- Cure periods:
- Remedies available to landlord:
- Re-entry/eviction procedures:

## TERMINATION PROVISIONS
- Early termination allowed? Under what conditions?
- Termination fee if applicable:
- Break option terms (if any):
- Lease renewal decline process:

## CRITICAL DATES (Next 5 Years)
| Date | Event | Action Required |
|------|-------|-----------------|

## RISKS & CONCERNS
- RED (Unfavorable) terms
- YELLOW (Ambiguous) provisions
- GREEN (Favorable) terms
- Missing provisions to negotiate

## ABSTRACTION FOR PORTFOLIO TRACKING
[Provide in format suitable for Excel/Lease Management Software]

Residential Lease Variant

For residential leases, modify to focus on:

  • Rent and deposit amounts
  • Move-in date and lease expiration
  • Renewal terms and notice requirements
  • Maintenance obligations
  • Pet policy and deposits
  • Utilities responsibility
  • Early termination penalties
  • Notice periods for non-renewal

MSA/SLA Review: Service Agreement Analysis

Exercise 6: Master Service Agreement & SLA Review

Scenario: Your client is entering into a Master Service Agreement with a cloud services provider. Compliance and operational commitments are critical.

Prompt:

I've uploaded an MSA and attached SLA. Please analyze from both
a legal and operational compliance perspective:

## AGREEMENT OVERVIEW
- Service provider (vendor):
- Services covered:
- Start date and term:
- Parties' roles and responsibilities:
- Overall risk assessment (1-10):

## SERVICE LEVEL AGREEMENT ANALYSIS
Extract and assess the SLA terms:

| Metric | Target Level | Measurement Period | Failure Consequence |
|--------|--------------|-------------------|-------------------|
| Uptime | 99.9%? | Monthly? | Credits? |
| Response Time | ? | ? | ? |
| Resolution Time | ? | ? | ? |
| Other metrics | | | |

- How are SLA metrics measured?
- Who reports on SLA compliance?
- What triggers SLA credits (if applicable)?
- Are credits cumulative or capped?
- Remedies if SLA breached (beyond credits):

## VENDOR OBLIGATIONS - CRITICAL ITEMS
- Primary services to be delivered:
- Specific deliverables (with timing):
- Performance standards:
- Quality requirements:
- Escalation procedures for issues:
- Staffing/resources committed:

## CLIENT OBLIGATIONS
- Payment obligations:
- Data provision/access requirements:
- Cooperation requirements:
- Compliance requirements imposed on client:
- Audit rights granted to vendor:

## COMPLIANCE & SECURITY
- Compliance certifications required (SOC 2, ISO, etc.):
- Security standards (encryption, access control, etc.):
- Data protection obligations:
- Audit rights (Client audit rights over Vendor):
- Compliance verification process:
- Frequency of security assessments:

## DATA & CONFIDENTIALITY
- Data ownership (whose data is it?):
- Data location restrictions (geographic):
- Subprocessors/subcontractors allowed?
- Data access restrictions:
- Data return/destruction at termination:
- Confidentiality obligations:
- Standard vs. specific for sensitive data:

## LIABILITY & INDEMNIFICATION
- Liability cap (if any):
- Exclusions from liability cap:
- Indemnification obligations (each party):
- Insurance requirements:
- Cyber liability insurance required?

## TERM & TERMINATION
- Initial term:
- Renewal terms:
- Termination for cause (grounds):
- Notice period for termination:
- Termination for convenience allowed?
- Wind-down period required:
- Data handling post-termination:

## COMPLIANCE VERIFICATION
For operational teams, identify:
- What must we monitor/document for compliance?
- What vendor documentation must we collect/retain?
- Audit schedule (when do we verify SLA performance)?
- Who owns compliance reporting (legal, operations, vendor mgmt)?

## RISK ASSESSMENT
- RED (High) compliance risks
- YELLOW (Medium) compliance risks
- GREEN (Acceptable/Managed)
- Gaps in vendor accountability
- Gaps in compliance verification process

## NEGOTIATION PRIORITIES
- Top 3 terms to modify
- Industry-standard language to propose
- Specific metrics to tighten SLA

Key Operational Considerations:

  • SLA Metrics: Service Level Agreements define measurable performance standards
  • Uptime Target: Percentage of time service must be available (99.9% = ~43 minutes/month downtime)
  • Credits: Partial refunds for SLA breaches (often capped at monthly fees)
  • Indemnification: Vendor's obligation to defend client against third-party claims
  • Audit Rights: Client's right to verify vendor compliance with agreement terms

Litigation Document Analysis

Exercise 7: Complaint Analysis

Scenario: Your client was just served with a complaint. You need a rapid assessment.

Prompt:

I've uploaded a complaint filed against my client. Please provide
a rapid assessment:

## CASE OVERVIEW
- Court and jurisdiction
- Parties and their roles (plaintiff, defendants, etc.)
- Filing date and case number
- Judge assigned (if shown)

## CLAIMS ANALYSIS
For each cause of action:

| Count | Claim Type | Elements Alleged | Key Allegations | Strength |
|-------|-----------|------------------|-----------------|----------|
| 1 | | | | |
| 2 | | | | |

For each claim:
- What must plaintiff prove?
- Specific factual allegations supporting claim
- Damages sought (and type)
- Initial viability assessment (Strong/Moderate/Weak)

## RELIEF SOUGHT
- Compensatory damages (amount claimed):
- Punitive damages requested:
- Injunctive relief (what conduct to stop/require):
- Attorney's fees demand:
- Pre-judgment interest:
- Any unusual remedies:

## CRITICAL DATES & DEADLINES
Based on the court and jurisdiction:
- Estimated answer deadline:
- Motion to dismiss deadline (if applicable):
- Other preliminary deadlines to research:
- Statute of limitations analysis (claim viable?):

## INITIAL DEFENSE ASSESSMENT
- Potential defenses (preliminary list):
- Jurisdictional or procedural challenges:
- Factual disputes apparent from complaint:
- Strength assessment per claim:
- Alternative theories that defeat claim:

## FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS SUMMARY
Organize into narrative by alleged events:
- What allegedly happened:
- When (timeline of events):
- Where (location/jurisdiction):
- Who was involved (individuals, companies):
- Relationships between parties:

## CLIENT COMMUNICATION REQUIREMENTS
- Immediate actions (next 48 hours):
- Information needed from client:
- Documents to preserve/collect:
- People to interview:

## PRELIMINARY COST/TIMELINE ESTIMATE
- Estimated litigation cost (ballpark):
- Expected timeline to resolution:
- Likelihood of summary judgment dismissal:
- Settlement assessment (early/late):

Exercise 8: Case Materials Summarization

Scenario: You're inheriting a litigation matter. You need to understand the status from 20 documents.

Prompt:

I've uploaded discovery materials, pleadings, and correspondence
from an ongoing litigation. Please create a matter summary:

## MATTER OVERVIEW
- Case name and number:
- Court and judge:
- Parties (plaintiffs, defendants, third parties):
- Case status (phase of litigation):
- Key dates/milestones passed:
- Upcoming critical dates:

## FACTUAL NARRATIVE
Create a chronological summary:
- Background and context:
- Key events leading to dispute:
- Incident/transaction at issue:
- Post-incident events and claims:
- Current status:

## LEGAL CLAIMS & DEFENSES
- Plaintiff's claims (summary):
- Our defenses (summary):
- Counterclaims (if any):
- Third-party claims (if any):

## KEY INDIVIDUALS & ROLES
| Name | Organization | Role | Key Involvement |
|------|--------------|------|-----------------|

## CRITICAL DOCUMENTS
- Contracts at issue:
- Communications showing knowledge/intent:
- Evidence supporting our position:
- Evidence hurting our position:
- Missing documents to pursue in discovery:

## DISCOVERY STATUS
- Discovery phase (initial/ongoing/complete):
- What we've produced:
- What we've received:
- Outstanding requests:
- Likely problem areas in discovery:

## MOTION PRACTICE & PROCEDURAL STATUS
- Pending motions:
- Recent court rulings:
- Upcoming deadlines:

## CURRENT ASSESSMENT
- Likelihood of summary judgment success:
- Trial risk assessment:
- Settlement value estimate:
- Next steps:

Clause Comparison Across Documents

Exercise 9: Identifying Language Variations

Scenario: You're comparing 5 vendor agreements for similar services. Key obligations vary across documents.

Prompt:

I've uploaded 5 service agreements from different vendors offering
similar services. Please perform a comparative analysis:

## COMPARISON FRAMEWORK
Create a master comparison table for each key provision:

### INDEMNIFICATION CLAUSE COMPARISON
| Vendor | Scope of Indemnity | Cap Amount | Cap Exceptions | Survival Period |
|--------|-------------------|-----------|-----------------|-----------------|
| A | IP infringement | $X | None | 5 years |
| B | | | | |

For each vendor, identify:
- Differences in scope (what's covered?)
- Differences in caps (limits on exposure)
- Differences in exceptions to caps
- Differences in survival periods
- Most restrictive vs. most permissive
- Industry standard language

### LIABILITY LIMITATION COMPARISON
| Vendor | Direct Damages Cap | Consequential Damages | Excluded Damages | Exclusions to Cap |
|--------|-------------------|---------------------|------------------|------------------|

### DATA PROTECTION OBLIGATION COMPARISON
| Vendor | Encryption | Access Controls | Audit Rights | Data Residency |
|--------|-----------|-----------------|--------------|-----------------|

### SLA & PERFORMANCE COMPARISON
| Vendor | Uptime Target | Response Time | Resolution Time | Remedy Type |
|--------|---------------|---------------|-----------------|-------------|

## PATTERN ANALYSIS
- Where do vendors cluster (standard market terms)?
- Where does one vendor differ significantly?
- Which differences are likely non-negotiable vs. negotiable?
- What's the "most protective" language across all vendors?

## RISK RANKING
Rank vendors for overall contract favorability to Client:
1. [Vendor] - Reasoning
2. [Vendor] - Reasoning
3. [Vendor] - Reasoning
...

## RECOMMENDED LANGUAGE
For each key clause category, recommend the "best" language
(synthesized from multiple vendors or from industry standards):

**INDEMNIFICATION LANGUAGE TO PROPOSE**:
- Scope recommendation
- Cap recommendation
- Survival recommendation

[Repeat for other key clauses]

## NEGOTIATION STRATEGY
- Which vendor has most favorable base language?
- Where to request movement from each vendor
- What's reasonable to concede
- Walk-away positions

Quick Clause Comparison Tool

For rapid comparison of single clauses across documents:

I've uploaded 3 contract versions. Compare their "CONFIDENTIALITY"
clause (usually near end of contract).

| Aspect | Version A | Version B | Version C | Best for Client |
|--------|-----------|-----------|-----------|-----------------|
| Scope | | | | |
| Duration | | | | |
| Exceptions | | | | |
| Return/Destruction | | | | |
| Injunctive Relief | | | | |

Then provide the optimal language we should propose.

Structured Data Export: Excel/CSV Workflows

Exercise 10: Contract Portfolio Data Extraction

Scenario: You manage a portfolio of 30 vendor contracts. You need the data in Excel for tracking and management.

Prompt:

I've uploaded [3-5] vendor contracts from our portfolio.
Extract key contract data and output in CSV format that I can
import into Excel:

CONTRACT_ID,VENDOR_NAME,CONTRACT_TYPE,EFFECTIVE_DATE,EXPIRATION_DATE,
TERM_YEARS,AUTO_RENEW,RENEWAL_NOTICE_DAYS,ANNUAL_VALUE,PAYMENT_TERMS,
LIABILITY_CAP,INDEMNIFICATION_SCOPE,SURVIVAL_PERIOD,GOVERNING_LAW,
TERMINATION_FOR_CAUSE,TERMINATION_FOR_CONVENIENCE,EARLY_TERMINATION_FEE,
AUDIT_RIGHTS,DATA_SECURITY_REQUIRED,INSURANCE_REQUIRED,CRITICAL_RISKS,
RENEWAL_DATE_CALENDAR,LAST_REVIEWED_DATE,NOTES

For each contract, complete the row.
Use standard formats:
- Dates: YYYY-MM-DD
- Currency: USD (or specify)
- Yes/No for binary fields
- Leave blank if not applicable/not found
- Notes: Any critical issues or unusual terms

Then provide the data in copy-paste CSV format I can import.

Exercise 11: Lease Portfolio Tracking

Prompt:

I've uploaded 5 commercial leases. Extract to Excel tracking sheet:

PROPERTY,UNIT,LEASE_ID,LANDLORD,TENANT,EFFECTIVE_DATE,LEASE_EXPIRATION,
INITIAL_TERM_YEARS,RENEWAL_OPTION_1,RENEWAL_NOTICE_DEADLINE,RENEWAL_DATE_1,
BASE_YEAR,ANNUAL_BASE_RENT_YEAR_1,ESCALATION_PCT,CAM_INCLUDED,
NNN_OPERATING_SHARE,PARKING_INCLUDED,USE_RESTRICTIONS,SIGNAGE_RIGHTS,
LEASE_MGMT_NOTES

Output in CSV format for Excel import.

Exercise 12: Due Diligence Document Index

For M&A, litigation, or audit projects, create structured indexing:

Prompt:

I've uploaded 20 documents from our due diligence package.
Create an index in CSV format for tracking:

DOC_ID,DOCUMENT_NAME,DOCUMENT_TYPE,DATE,FROM_PARTY,TO_PARTY,
SUBJECT_MATTER,PAGE_COUNT,PRIVILEGE_ASSERTION,RESPONSIVE_TO_RFP,
KEY_FINDINGS,CRITICAL_ISSUES,RELEVANCE_SCORE,NEXT_STEPS

Document types: Contract, Email, Internal Memo, Financial Statement,
Correspondence, Regulatory Filing, Board Minutes, Other

Relevance Score: 1-10 (10 = most important to deal analysis)

Output in CSV for Excel.

Exporting Data from Claude to Excel

Method 1: CSV Import

  • Copy CSV data from Claude
  • Open Excel
  • Data > Text to Columns (paste-special)
  • Delimited by comma
  • Adjust column widths

Method 2: JSON Export (for complex data)

Output the extracted data as JSON, which I can import into Excel
using Power Query or other tools.

Method 3: Direct Table Format

Output as Markdown table, which I can copy directly into Excel.

Discovery Document Review

Bulk Document Processing Strategy

For large document sets, use this workflow:

Step 1: Categorization Prompt

I'm going to share multiple documents from discovery. For each
document, provide a one-line categorization:

Format: [Doc #] | [Type] | [Date] | [Key Parties] | [Relevance: High/Medium/Low/None] | [Privilege Flag: Y/N]

Types to use:
- EMAIL
- CONTRACT
- INTERNAL_MEMO
- EXTERNAL_CORRESPONDENCE
- FINANCIAL_RECORD
- PERSONNEL_FILE
- MEETING_NOTES
- REPORT
- OTHER

Step 2: Deep Dive on Relevant Documents

For document [#], which you categorized as HIGH relevance:

1. Full summary (2-3 paragraphs)
2. Key individuals mentioned (with roles if apparent)
3. Dates and timeline of events discussed
4. Specific quotes that may be useful (with page reference)
5. Connection to other documents reviewed
6. Recommended follow-up actions

Step 3: Pattern Recognition

Based on all documents reviewed in this session:

1. Timeline of key events
2. Cast of characters (who knew what, when)
3. Patterns in communication (who CC'd whom)
4. Gaps in the document production
5. Areas requiring additional discovery
6. Preliminary narrative emerging from documents

Comparing to Legora's Tabular Review

Legora's Feature: Automatically extracts data points into spreadsheet format across 100s of documents.

Claude's Approach: More manual but equally effective:

I'm uploading 10 contracts from the same vendor.
Extract into a table format:

| Doc | Effective Date | Counterparty | Annual Value | Term | Auto-Renew? | Liability Cap | Key Risk |
|-----|----------------|--------------|--------------|------|-------------|---------------|----------|

Then identify any outliers or inconsistencies across the portfolio.

Document Analysis Quality Control

The VALID Framework

V - Verify page/paragraph references Claude provides A - Ask for specific quotes to support conclusions L - Look for what's missing (Claude may not flag absences) I - Investigate any citations or legal claims D - Double-check numbers and dates

Common Document Analysis Errors (Expanded)

Error TypeHow to CatchPrevention
Hallucinated clausesRequest page numbersAsk for exact quotes
Missed provisionsReview table of contentsAsk "Is there a [X] clause?"
Misinterpreted partyConfirm party identificationBe explicit about your side
Wrong jurisdictionVerify governing law clauseState jurisdiction upfront
Outdated lawCheck citationsSpecify "current as of 2026"
Calculation errorsRequest sourceVerify all financial numbers
Missing exhibitsNote referenced documentsAsk "How many exhibits?"

Quality Control Checklist for M&A Documents

  • All parties correctly identified
  • All dates verified (signature, effective, etc.)
  • Calculation formulas confirmed
  • Warranty scope limitations noted
  • Indemnification baskets and caps confirmed
  • Survival periods accurate
  • Closing conditions complete
  • All exhibits/schedules referenced and located
  • Jurisdictional conflicts checked
  • Key operational deadlines identified

Quality Control Checklist for Leases

  • Landlord and tenant names verified
  • Address of property confirmed
  • Lease commencement and expiration dates verified
  • All renewal options located and terms extracted
  • Rent schedule complete and mathematically verified
  • Escalation mechanism clarified
  • Operating expense methodology understood
  • All restrictions on use identified
  • All renewal notice deadlines calculated
  • Insurance requirements confirmed

Competitive Summary: Claude vs. Harvey vs. Legora

Feature Comparison Matrix

FeatureClaudeHarveyLegora
Document Types SupportedPDF, DOCX, TXT, ImagesPDF, DOCXPDF, DOCX, Email
Max Document Size500+ pagesLimited500+ pages
Custom Analysis PromptsFull controlTemplates onlyLimited
Bulk ProcessingManual batchingWorkflow-basedAutomated (100s docs)
Data Extraction to CSV/ExcelUser-drivenIntegrated exportIntegrated export
Cost Per Document$0.01-0.05 (approx)Enterprise pricingPer-document fees
Setup Time0 minutesWeeks (enterprise)Days
Comparison AnalysisExcellentLimitedGood
SPA/M&A FocusExcellentGoodGood
Lease AbstractionExcellentLimitedModerate
Litigation SupportExcellentGoodModerate
API/IntegrationVia Claude APIEnterprise integrationAPI available
Team CollaborationVia ProjectsBuilt-inPortal-based
Audit TrailLimitedIntegratedIntegrated

Cost Analysis (Rough 2026 Estimates)

Claude:

  • No upfront costs
  • Pay-as-you-go ($1-5 for document analysis)
  • 5 M&A documents: $5-25
  • 30-contract portfolio review: $25-50

Harvey:

  • $10,000+ monthly (enterprise)
  • Workflow setup: 2-4 weeks
  • 5 M&A documents: Included
  • 30-contract portfolio: Included

Legora:

  • $500-1,500 per project
  • 5 M&A documents: $1,500-3,000
  • 30-contract portfolio: $2,000-5,000

Winner by Use Case:

  • Single/small batch review: Claude
  • Large enterprise portfolio: Harvey or Legora
  • Specialized analysis: Claude
  • Compliance automation: Legora
  • Litigation support: Claude

Real-World Workflows

Workflow 1: 48-Hour SPA Review

Timeline: M&A deal just entered diligence phase

Day 1 - Morning:

  • Upload SPA to Claude
  • Run Exercise 4 prompt (SPA Comprehensive Review)
  • Extract key dates and closing conditions
  • Identify HIGH RISK items

Day 1 - Afternoon:

  • Meet with business team
  • Discuss feasibility of closing conditions
  • Identify deal-breakers vs. negotiable items

Day 2 - Morning:

  • Upload counterparty's responses (if available)
  • Compare proposed modifications
  • Draft negotiation strategy

Day 2 - Afternoon:

  • Present findings to deal team
  • Recommend proceed/don't proceed/renegotiate

Workflow 2: Litigation Document Management

New matter intake:

  1. Upload complaint
  2. Run Exercise 7 prompt (Complaint Analysis)
  3. Create initial case assessment
  4. Extract key dates and deadlines
  5. Set calendar reminders for answer deadlines

Ongoing discovery:

  1. Batch upload 5-10 documents weekly
  2. Run Exercise 8 prompt (Case Materials Summarization)
  3. Add to matter timeline
  4. Flag critical documents
  5. Build narrative for trial preparation

Workflow 3: Vendor Contract Portfolio Management

Quarterly review:

  1. Extract all vendor contract data using Exercise 10
  2. Import to Excel
  3. Identify contracts expiring in next quarter
  4. Flag contracts without termination limits
  5. Prioritize renegotiation targets

New vendor onboarding:

  1. Receive proposed MSA/SLA
  2. Run Exercise 6 prompt (MSA/SLA Review)
  3. Compare to standard template
  4. Identify gaps vs. our template
  5. Provide negotiation instructions to procurement

Information Extraction Templates

Template 1: Contract Data Extraction

Extract the following data points from this agreement:

**PARTIES**
- Party A (Full legal name):
- Party A Address:
- Party B (Full legal name):
- Party B Address:

**DATES**
- Effective Date:
- Execution Date:
- Initial Term:
- Renewal Terms:
- Notice Period for Termination:

**FINANCIAL**
- Total Contract Value:
- Payment Terms:
- Price Adjustment Mechanism:
- Late Payment Penalties:

**KEY OBLIGATIONS**
- Party A's Primary Obligations:
- Party B's Primary Obligations:
- Specific Deliverables:
- Milestones:

**RISK TERMS**
- Liability Cap:
- Indemnification Obligations:
- Insurance Requirements:
- Warranty Period:

**GOVERNANCE**
- Governing Law:
- Dispute Resolution:
- Venue:
- Notice Addresses:

Output in JSON format for easy database import.

Template 2: Litigation Fact Extraction

From this document, extract:

**WHAT HAPPENED**
- Events described:
- Sequence (chronological):
- Location:

**WHO WAS INVOLVED**
- People mentioned (name, role, organization):
- Witnesses to events:
- Decision-makers:

**WHEN**
- Specific dates mentioned:
- Time periods referenced:
- Deadlines or milestones:

**EVIDENCE**
- Documents referenced:
- Communications described:
- Physical evidence mentioned:

**ADMISSIONS/STATEMENTS**
- Statements against interest:
- Acknowledgments:
- Promises made:

Include exact quotes with location reference where applicable.

Homework Before Tutorial 04

  1. Process 3 different document types

    • One contract
    • One litigation document
    • One lease or service agreement
  2. Compare clause variations

    • Download 2 versions of a template
    • Use Exercise 9 to identify differences
  3. Create a data extraction template

    • Identify a document type you work with regularly
    • Design CSV structure for export
    • Test with 3 sample documents
  4. Build a portfolio tracker

    • Gather 5 contracts from your practice
    • Extract data using Exercise 10 format
    • Create Excel sheet for management
  5. Test the VALID framework

    • Find a document you know well
    • Have Claude analyze it
    • Verify 5 key facts using the VALID framework
    • Note accuracy rate

Key Takeaways

  • Claude excels at customized document analysis
  • M&A documents require specific structured analysis
  • Lease abstractions save hours of manual review
  • SLA compliance tracking protects operations
  • Litigation summaries accelerate case assessment
  • Comparative clause analysis prevents costly mistakes
  • Structured data export integrates with business systems
  • Quality control frameworks catch hallucinations
  • Cost-effectiveness allows detailed review of all documents

Next Steps

Continue to Tutorial 04: Using Claude Projects for Matter Management to learn how to organize your work with persistent workspaces.

Previous: Tutorial 02: Getting Started with Claude

On this page

Learning ObjectivesClaude's Document CapabilitiesWhat Claude Can ProcessUploading DocumentsPro Tip: Preparing DocumentsSingle Document Analysis & Competitive ComparisonExercise 1: Full Contract ReviewComparing to Harvey and LegoraComparative Document AnalysisExercise 2: Redline AnalysisExercise 3: Multiple Contract ComparisonM&A Due Diligence: Share Purchase Agreement AnalysisExercise 4: SPA Comprehensive ReviewLease Analysis & AbstractionExercise 5: Commercial Lease Term ExtractionResidential Lease VariantMSA/SLA Review: Service Agreement AnalysisExercise 6: Master Service Agreement & SLA ReviewLitigation Document AnalysisExercise 7: Complaint AnalysisExercise 8: Case Materials SummarizationClause Comparison Across DocumentsExercise 9: Identifying Language VariationsQuick Clause Comparison ToolStructured Data Export: Excel/CSV WorkflowsExercise 10: Contract Portfolio Data ExtractionExercise 11: Lease Portfolio TrackingExercise 12: Due Diligence Document IndexExporting Data from Claude to ExcelDiscovery Document ReviewBulk Document Processing StrategyComparing to Legora's Tabular ReviewDocument Analysis Quality ControlThe VALID FrameworkCommon Document Analysis Errors (Expanded)Quality Control Checklist for M&A DocumentsQuality Control Checklist for LeasesCompetitive Summary: Claude vs. Harvey vs. LegoraFeature Comparison MatrixCost Analysis (Rough 2026 Estimates)Real-World WorkflowsWorkflow 1: 48-Hour SPA ReviewWorkflow 2: Litigation Document ManagementWorkflow 3: Vendor Contract Portfolio ManagementInformation Extraction TemplatesTemplate 1: Contract Data ExtractionTemplate 2: Litigation Fact ExtractionHomework Before Tutorial 04Key TakeawaysNext Steps