Litigation & Dispute Resolution

Precedent Analysis

Analyze patterns in case outcomes, distinguish helpful from harmful authority, and assess litigation risk based on analogous precedent. Reduces precedent analysis by 60-75%.

Time Saved

60-75% reduction in precedent analysis

Accuracy

Comprehensive pattern identification

The Problem

✗Finding truly analogous cases
✗Distinguishing helpful from harmful precedent
✗Synthesizing patterns across many decisions
✗Predicting likely outcomes
✗Advising clients on litigation risk

How Claude Helps

Identifies analogous precedent via MCP, analyzes patterns in case outcomes, distinguishes helpful and harmful authority, assesses litigation risk, and develops arguments based on precedent.

Step-by-Step Workflow

Define legal issue and facts

Your case specifics

Search for analogous cases via MCP

Midpage and CourtListener

Analyze outcome patterns

How courts have ruled

Identify distinguishing factors

What drives different outcomes

Develop arguments

Based on favorable precedent

Assess litigation risk

Overall risk memo

Example Prompt

Analyze precedent for our breach of non-compete case.

OUR FACTS:
- Employee signed 2-year non-compete with 50-mile radius
- Employee left after 3 years with company
- Started competing business 30 miles away
- Former employer claims customer solicitation

RESEARCH QUESTIONS:
1. How do courts in [State] typically rule on 2-year non-competes?
2. Are 50-mile radius restrictions generally enforced?
3. What factors lead to injunctive relief vs. damages only?
4. How do courts treat post-employment periods (3 years)?

ANALYSIS REQUESTED:
1. Favorable precedent (cases finding non-competes unenforceable)
2. Unfavorable precedent (cases enforcing similar restrictions)
3. Distinguishing factors in each category
4. Likely outcome assessment
5. Recommended strategy

Format as litigation risk memo with citations.